The WWE Universe has always been buzzing with anticipation when it comes to WrestleMania feuds, but sometimes, not all rivalries live up to the hype. The high-profile showdown between Roman Reigns, CM Punk, and Seth Rollins is one such example. Although these three megastars bring unmatched talent and charisma, their feud has failed to deliver on the promise many fans expected. In this article, we’ll break down why Roman Reigns vs CM Punk vs Seth Rollins might just be the worst WrestleMania feud of the Triple H era. Let’s dive into the reasons behind this unpopular opinion
1. **Lack of Clear Storytelling: The Confusing Narrative**
A key aspect of any great WWE feud is a strong, clear, and compelling storyline. Unfortunately, the build-up to the Roman Reigns vs CM Punk vs Seth Rollins match lacks the clarity that fans expect from a major WrestleMania showdown. While each superstar has personal history and potential rivalries, the storyline connecting them seems rushed and inconsistent.
Instead of developing a well-rounded narrative, WWE has focused more on individual rivalries without truly integrating them into a coherent storyline. CM Punk’s return, Roman’s dominance, and Seth’s fury at both competitors could have made for an explosive storyline. However, the lack of direction has resulted in a confusing buildup that has left fans scratching their heads, unsure of the true stakes at hand.
1. **Overused Rivalries: A Lack of Freshness**
One of the main issues with this feud is that it feels overdone. Roman Reigns has been the top dog in WWE for years, and while his dominance is impressive, it’s starting to feel like we’ve seen it all before. His interactions with Seth Rollins have been intense, but the rivalry has been stretched out for too long, losing the initial excitement.
Similarly, CM Punk’s return was met with huge fanfare, but his involvement in this feud feels like a missed opportunity. Punk’s clash with Roman Reigns, a long-awaited match by many, has become predictable rather than exciting. Instead of creating new and fresh rivalries, WWE is recycling old ones, leading to a sense of stagnation in this WrestleMania feud.
1. **Missed Opportunities for New Stars to Shine**
WrestleMania is the place where new stars should rise and make a name for themselves. Yet, in this feud, the focus is primarily on veterans who have already had their moments in the spotlight. While Roman, Punk, and Rollins are undeniably talented, this feud could have been the perfect opportunity to elevate a younger superstar or create a fresh rivalry that would captivate the WWE Universe.
Instead, WWE has relied heavily on established names, which has led to a lack of new, exciting talent getting the chance to shine on the grandest stage of them all. Fans have long been calling for new blood to step up, but this feud has failed to deliver in that regard.
1. **Unpredictability Factor Is Lacking**
One of the key ingredients for a successful WWE feud is unpredictability. The best rivalries keep fans guessing, offering surprise twists and unexpected turns. Unfortunately, the Roman Reigns vs CM Punk vs Seth Rollins feud has lacked this element of surprise.
We all know that Roman Reigns will likely retain his championship at WrestleMania, and the interactions between Punk and Seth Rollins feel predictable. There’s a general sense that this feud is heading in a familiar direction, and fans are already anticipating the conclusion without much excitement. The lack of shocking moments or unexpected outcomes has made this rivalry fall flat for many.
1. **The Overemphasis on Personal Feuds Rather Than Stakes**
While personal rivalries can add intensity to a feud, it’s crucial to have high stakes to make the storyline feel worthwhile. Unfortunately, in this case, the personal tensions between Reigns, Punk, and Rollins don’t carry the weight they should. The stakes feel more focused on ego and pride rather than something truly valuable, like a championship or career-defining moment.
Without solid stakes, the feud feels like it’s missing the urgency and importance that should come with a WrestleMania-level match. Fans want to see battles that feel like they could change the landscape of WWE, but this rivalry lacks that “big fight feel.”
1. **WWE’s Over-Reliance on Legacy and History**
WrestleMania is all about creating unforgettable moments, but this feud seems to be more focused on the legacy of Roman Reigns, CM Punk, and Seth Rollins rather than creating something new. While nostalgia can be a powerful tool in storytelling, relying too heavily on legacy and past accomplishments can hinder the development of fresh, exciting storylines.
Instead of building on new angles, WWE has rested on the laurels of these legends, giving fans more of the same rather than introducing something innovative. WrestleMania is a time for new stories and matches that leave a lasting impact, but this feud feels more like a rehash of old battles with nothing new to offer.
In the Triple H era of WWE, Roman Reigns vs CM Punk vs Seth Rollins is arguably one of the most disappointing and underwhelming feuds. From the lack of clear storytelling and overused rivalries to missed opportunities for new stars and the absence of unpredictability, this feud falls short of the high expectations that fans have for a WrestleMania showdown. While all three superstars are incredibly talented, the lack of fresh ideas and compelling narratives has left fans less excited than they should be.
WrestleMania is meant to be the culmination of the most dramatic and exhilarating storylines, but this feud, unfortunately, feels like a missed opportunity. Here’s hoping WWE takes these lessons and learns how to deliver something truly spectacular in future WrestleMania events. Until then, this might just go down as one of the worst WrestleMania feuds of the Triple H era.